The pattern
Then reality intervenes
Every year, leadership teams put real time and energy into their strategy. They review the market, debate priorities, set ambitions and leave the offsite with a renewed sense of purpose.
Then reality intervenes. Customers behave differently. Markets move. Resources tighten. Priorities compete. Some assumptions prove wrong. Some things work and others don't.
Twelve months later, the team gathers again to write the next strategy. How much of that time goes on understanding what happened to the last one?
In most agendas I see, very little. If last year appears at all, it's a slide of headline numbers in the first hour. Put the review at the front of the planning event and it gets rushed, because everyone knows the energising part comes after lunch. The same assumptions travel quietly into the new plan.
That's why the Reality Check gets its own time, well before the offsite. Reflection needs space to sit with an uncomfortable answer before anyone is asked to commit to the next one.
A new strategy is not necessarily a better strategy. It depends on what you were prepared to learn from the last one.